On 6/12/24 10:39 AM, Mike Saunders wrote:
On 12/06/2024 16:22, Justin Luth wrote:
FRESH is still only suitable for early adopters.
OK, but that raises the question then of whether we should even offer
it prominently on the download page, or as the first option. In your
view, should we then offer the "branch formerly known as still" first?
For the benefit of the downloader, yes, I would say it should be listed
first.
For the benefit of TDF and promotional hype and getting large numbers of
people banging on the product to find bugs and crashes, I can see that
it makes good sense to put the newest version as the first option. That
is why it needs to be very clear that this is only for early adopters.
Use the FRESH version if you want to help
the community improve the product by testing and bug reporting.
We already encourage (technically-minded) users to help test during
the development cycle: alpha, beta, release candidates etc. So we have
to be careful, not that we imply: Thanks for helping to test all
during the development cycle and RCs! But even though we've released
it, it's still not ready and needs more testing.
Actually, that is exactly what we should be implying. While it is FRESH,
it still is not really ready, and definitely needs more real-world testing.
Justin
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.