Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hello Marc,

Le mardi 14 mai 2013 à 16:49 -0400, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 13/05/13 06:46 AM, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hello everyone,

I'd like to share with you an early report on our Facebook ad campaign.
My first surprize was that a Facebook ad has to be validated by Facebook
and it  does take time (several days). Consequently, the ad campaign
effectively started on the 7th of May. From the 7th till today (6 days)
the ad was seen by 74,298 unique people, over a general scope of over
135 Million people (people selected in English-speaking geographies with
specific interests, from small business owner to education-interested
audiences and tech early adopters). I can provide a specific audience
segmentation if needed. Needless to say, I configured the ad to run for
people who are not related to LibreOffice. The goal of this ad was to
get more "Likes", and thus the report follows that logic.

The ad was seen by 74,298 people, that's the effective outreach of the
ad until now. On these people, 718 people actually clicked on the ad,
went to the LibreOffice Facebook page and on these 718 people, 560 liked
it (clicked on the like this page button).

This costed (again, till today) 165 Euros and 46 cents. Keep in mind we
have set a limit of 30 Euros for each day the ads run. In the end it
seems that each "Like" by anyone on Facebook to the LibreOffice page
costs 30  cents.

I have more in-depth metrics if anyone's interested, but I'd like to
share my feeling about this ad: On the one hand it's great because it
seems we are able to raise the awareness of LibreOffice; both the
potential audience and the effective audience numbers are impressive;
but then what does clicking on a Like button mean? I don't know what to
think about that.

I'm sure we can have another campaign with different objectives,
(Facebook ads can be run according to more complex patterns) but at this
stage I'm both happy by the audience and at the same time I  don't know
what to do with it: so we got 560 clicks. "Cool", so what? :-) let's be
thankful for them and hope we are attracting not just new users but
future contributors as well.

Your thoughts are welcome,


I think our objective show be four-fold:

* we are at the very least looking for marketing and brand recognition 
,-- it looks like we got some good coverage with people at least seeing 
the ad -- approximatley 75 000 people

* we are looking for clicks on the ad -- we got 1%. I was hoping for 
more of 2% which would have translated to 1500 instead ... in my 
experience a 2% return in the publishing arena is a good return on ad 
placements or for any type of marketing campaigns.

* we are looking for a spike in download for that particular period. We 
would need the download metrics for that particular period.

* we are looking for a smaller spike in donations for that particular 
period.


Most important of these points is the spike in downloads which is what 
we need from our ad readers. Once they have gotten to try LibreOffice we 
should not have a problem retaining them as regular users.

Is there a way of getting the download numbers for that period and 
compare it to a regular previous period?

Thanks for doing this, it will show us if FaceBook ads are of any value 
to us.


Thanks a lot for your feedback. You're making a very good point: the
download spike. As we're speaking the people who liked our facebook page
because of this ad campaign are several hundreds . I do not think we
could observe that spike if there were any, but as the campaign is
supposed to run for about a month, we may be able to observe the
download spike in a few weeks. I'll return to the list with this data by
then.

Of course, one can always wonder what "liking a page" means regardless
of any philosophical consideration, as that's my case. Do you like the
page because you think it's a cool project, did you click out of boredom
or did you actually download the software and use it? All good questions
to ask...  :-)

Best,
-- 
Charles-H. Schulz
Co-Founder & Director, The Document Foundation,
Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint




-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.