Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I agree in part with you,  but the need to have these features listed
somewhere not too buried has been identified. That, however does not mean
we should not rethink our website and presentation on community, the
project, etc. I am just trying to break down work items in a way that
volunteers can do something about it.


Le 26 oct. 2012 00:31, "Bjoern Michaelsen" <>
a écrit :

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:36:52AM +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Let have both. Features list is usually requested strongly by local

Yes, but is that the question that we should ask ourselves when putting
something on the webpage? Or rather: What helps us grow users and esp.
contributors? I dont think ancient and boring features in a flowing text
at all. If anything something like:

is what is the maximum we should subject the reader too. Everything that
people from:

- the download button
- the donation button
- the contribution howto

for just one second is losing us users and contributors given todays short
attention spans.



Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.