Le 2010-10-27 13:26, jonathon a écrit :
* Why ODF formats are better;
* Why use LibO;
Of all the arguments presented, in my opinion, these two are the most
important. It we are to market LibO then we also market ODF by default.
The ODF is what will change the scene in the US market especially. MSO
is firmly entrenched, however, the constant complaint that has never
been fixed is .doc incompatibility from one version to the next. Any big
organisation has known and lived through it. They know the amount of
time and expense it takes to update their documents and for all intents
and purposes, people normally give up.
We are sure to make a difference by offering import filters for old .doc
files and an ISO format from the ODF that promises the longevity of the
document file. This will sell.
As a teacher and IT liaison for my school, I know how it feels to have
40 staff members clamouring for help with the document migration to the
newer .doc version. Extremely time consuming and frustrating. Not to
mention 350 students with files in their accounts! And we are a small
school.
Marc
--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-marketing] LibO in the News - Mac360.com Commentary (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.