On Sun Oct 17 2010 19:24:11 GMT-0700 (PDT) Ramon Sole wrote:
Hi *,
I disagree, I feel same people can't be ruling OOo and TDF. And I see a
clear Conflict of Interest for people in the Community Council.
Both communities will be able to collaborate in tons of things, but the
project leaders can't share responsabilities in both projects. If so,
why to have two Communities?
The shame is that a such simple thing has been to be asked by the OOo
Council members to some people. You can't fork a open source project and
keep leading the original one! It's atonishing just trying to do it.
Best Greetings,
Hi Ramon,
As a member of the overall community is that the CC members be recalled
by those that elected them. For Oracle just have them removed it not
right. A special election should be help to replace them. That is all
I am asking for.
Andy
--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-marketing] OpenOffice.org Roles · leif
Re: [libreoffice-marketing] OpenOffice.org Roles · Bernhard Dippold
Re: [libreoffice-marketing] OpenOffice.org Roles · Görkem Çetin
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.