Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 2010-10-12 20:41, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2010-10-12 20:05, Alexandro Colorado a écrit :


I am not sure it makes sense to split marketing efforts between
countries.
Is much better to have separation between languages instead.




Hi Alexandro:

For some countries, a split like this would help in getting
representation to expositions; LinuxFests; conventions. It is about
marketing the brand in the represented country. I believe this is what
Charles was talking about. The belief is that there was/is not enough
representation in the US for the LibreOffice/OpenOffice brand and the
push is to get more feet on the ground to market LibreOffice.

In Canada, from what I gather, it is non-existent. Better to pool
resources in these zones to help out. If we could perhaps have a N.
American contingent, then, the better for the LibreOffice brand. Once
organized, the splitting of organizations along country designations
would make sense.

Realistically, the US partners would obviously make the larger part of
contributions just by the sheer number in population.

Wouldn't this make sense for Mexico as well?

Marc



Just a note to see if there had been a decision about this? Are we going with the sole US group or n.amer. group? Or are people still thinking this one out?

Marc


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.