Re: [libreoffice-l10n] 50% of translations lost

Thanks, this looks promissing,
I could work with this.



On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Christian Lohmaier <
cloph@documentfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi *,
>
> Am 13.12.2017 um 19:37 schrieb Berend Ytsma:
> > I don't see any difference,
> > The only thing i see is that there is now 1 suggestion.
>
> Hmm. For some reason pot2po run separately does manage to get the
> translation, although it fails when using pomerge2 with the "use pot2po"
> switch.. Strange.
> (and in fact even stranger that it still managed to add back 155565
> strings nevertheless...)
>
> I'm now running a pot2po-only script, that should fill in the gaps (but
> will flag ~all strings it finds as fuzzy, so removing the fuzzy marker
> still is an excercise for another script)
>
> ciao
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Lohmaier, Release Engineer
> Tel: +49 30 5557992-60 | IRC: cloph on Freenode
> The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
> Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
> Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted