Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Updated templates for master

You are talking wisely

On 16/10/17 13:47, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote:
> 2017-10-13 7:45 GMT-05:00 Yury Tarasievich <yury.tarasievich@gmail.com>:
> > Seconding this. The project just throws away the l10n people man-hours (but
> > just you try to get them dev guys to fix something in the code!).
>
> What are you talking about? Developers are committing many patches per
> day, even on holidays (see e.g. our GitHub Pulse or our dashboard).
> This is a ridiculous accusation.

No. And you are turning things upside down.

Developers do much, providing they like what 
they do (are about to do). On the other hand, 
the important and visible functionality may sit 
there *virtually* broken for years (like, hey, 
ms word import/export involving formulas).

Returning to question at hand: people here are 
expressing their frustration because the actual 
workflow model allows for cascading workloads 
for everybody with very little rationale behind.

BTW, does developer side suffer from such kind 
of problem? Never, I believe. Everything is 
coordinated (and rightly so!)

Also, I've translated mozilla stack in my day, 
and I know it allows for *economising* 
translator's effort -- much of the content is 
replicated. And I've NEVER seen a 25-30% 
'update' of the kind we are talking about here.

-Yury

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted