Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function

Hi :)
I am not sure who to report it to but this list seems to be a good place.  

I have been aware of a couple of your posts not getting responses but that seems to be just because 
everyone is busy and rushing through a lot of work right now.  Hopefully those issues will get 
dealt with.  Since they have reached this list it's always possible that someone might go back 
through archives and find posts that have 0 responses and "bump the thread" when it gets a bit 
quieter here.  

Don't worry about the 40%.  Keep moving forwards.  Other people may follow.  Also there is a good 
chance that as you go forwards you may remember something about ones you noticed earlier and be 
able to give us enough of a hint or a clue so that other people can hunt for them.  You have the 
momentum and are doing great stuff with it so just keep pushing through if you have the time.

I have posted on the Users List to see if anyone there could join in here but i am not expecting 
any responses.  The QA team are running a competition and the Users seem to be caught up in that at 
the moment.  
Many regards from 
Tom :)  





> ________________________________
> From: Mihovil Stanic <mihovil.stanic@gmail.com>
> To: l10n@global.libreoffice.org 
> Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013, 12:20
> Subject: Re: Fw: [libreoffice-l10n] YearFrac NOT IMPOWER function
>
>
>
> Dana 28.6.2013. 13:12, Tom Davies je napisao:
> > Hi :)
> > Yes, if it's been wrong for 9 years then another 1 month or so is unlikely to cause major 
> > problems.  Fixing in Master sounds like the correction will automatically start to ripple out to 
> > everywhere it needs to be as soon as the freeze is over and then get translated as people get to 
> > it.  So, that all sounds good
> > Thanks and regards from
> > Tom :)
> Master is fine, as long as it gets fixed.
> I didn't report few errors since I didn't think it will be fixed and I 
> hate to go back now and search for them since I went through about 40% 
> of all formulas text.
>
> I'll keep reporting what I find in future.
>
> Also, to whom I can report that bug with not using "commas" in complex 
> numbers?
> ----------------------------------
> Result of this formula doesn't follow default decimal separator for 
> language in use.
> For example, if you apply this formula:
> =IMPOWER("2+3i";1/2)
>
> Result is:
> 1.67414922803554+0.895977476129838i
>
> When for Croatian locale it should be:
> 1,67414922803554+0,895977476129838i
> ------------------------------------
>
> Best regards,
> Mihovil
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted