Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Removing older versions of strings from pootle

2011.04.18. 11:54 keltezéssel, Dwayne Bailey írta:
> On 2011-04-17 23:33, André Schnabel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 17.04.2011 20:59, schrieb Andras Timar:
> > > > I also suggest removing version number from the name of the projects,
> > > > because it has several benefits. One of them is preserving
> > > > contribution statistics of the project.
> > > That's a good point. Statistics are important. I wonder what others
> > > think.
> >
> > I wonder why it should be important for the statistics if we have
> > Version numbers in the project or not.  If someone is actually doing a
> > translation this is counted - and that is what matters (regardless of
> > the version she contributed to).
> By using project names such as "libo-current-ui" and "libo-next-ui" you
> could achieve this statistics stability, if required.  The descriptive
> name of the project could then communicate that this is 3.3.x vs 3.4.x
But at some point I need to move libo-next-ui to libo-current-ui and
create a new libo-next-ui. IMHO it's not a rename operation. Or is it?

Anyway, André is right, statistics per language should be enough. It
would be the best, if I didn't have to change anything in our current
setup. :)

Thanks,
Andras

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted