Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

2011.04.18. 11:54 keltezéssel, Dwayne Bailey írta:

On 2011-04-17 23:33, André Schnabel wrote:

Am 17.04.2011 20:59, schrieb Andras Timar:

I also suggest removing version number from the name of the projects,
because it has several benefits. One of them is preserving
contribution statistics of the project.
That's a good point. Statistics are important. I wonder what others

I wonder why it should be important for the statistics if we have
Version numbers in the project or not.  If someone is actually doing a
translation this is counted - and that is what matters (regardless of
the version she contributed to).
By using project names such as "libo-current-ui" and "libo-next-ui" you
could achieve this statistics stability, if required.  The descriptive
name of the project could then communicate that this is 3.3.x vs 3.4.x

But at some point I need to move libo-next-ui to libo-current-ui and
create a new libo-next-ui. IMHO it's not a rename operation. Or is it?

Anyway, André is right, statistics per language should be enough. It
would be the best, if I didn't have to change anything in our current
setup. :)


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.