Hi,
Am 14.04.2011 22:19, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Alexander Thurgood wrote:
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4009:rmqegm.2.1
PIVOTTABLE is a registered federal US trademark, assigned to Microsoft Corp.
And so far we all agree, and this is the premise of the old issue I
mentioned: http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116757
But does this mean that, like Stefan wrote in
http://www.mail-archive.com/l10n@libreoffice.org/msg02401.html
all possible derivatives including "Pivot Table" must be avoided?
As Stefan wrote, this might be true for several local juristications.
(E.G. In Germany
you should not use a uppercase magenta T to name your IT-related
services, unless
you want to be sued by German Telekom. Even using magenta color is a risc.)
I understand the point of view of those who believe it's better being
safe than sorry, but this change would have some positive effects for
users who look for the "Pivot Table" functionality and fail to recognize
that "Data Pilot" is what they are looking for. Of course they get
accustomed, but still this sounds like a ripoff of Pivot Tables...
Hmm .. ok, seems there are different opinions in the localization
teams. So let's deal
each localization team with this.
André
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Rename datapilot to Pivot Table? (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.