On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Christian Lohmaier
<lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com> wrote:
Maybe (I don't know) it is more efficient to run multiple manage
processes in parallel, with the task to update one language only
instead of starting one and giving it the task to update all languages
at once.
..or if it does similar weirdo stuff like when creating zip, request
one language only at first, and then see whether processing an
additional one is (much) faster than the initial language)
ciao
Christian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pootle migration (continued)
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pootle migration · Sérgio Marques
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pootle migration · Leif Lodahl
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pootle migration · Rimas Kudelis
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.