Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Regarding this discussion:
I just witnessed some very similar things: on the OOo PR mailing list Oracle
pressing to small changes in the PR statement for the 3.3 release and here
steering committee assignee forcing his rights as far as website content is
concerned, even if it does not correspond to the true needs of what that
page needs to state (as far as I can tell so far).

Are LO and OOo really that different? Will LO/TDF and its formal structure
become constringent like OOo (and Oracle)? I know it is not alarming as this
but... it can happen.

Lp, m.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.