Hi Miklos,
I didn't understand the swap thing, indeed, both use rInf.GetTextHeight( ):
810 bool SwFieldFormCheckboxPortion::Format( SwTextFormatInfo & rInf )
811 {
812 SwPosition const
aPosition(rInf.GetTextFrame()->MapViewToModelPos(rInf.GetIdx()));
813 IFieldmark const*const pBM =
rInf.GetTextFrame()->GetDoc().getIDocumentMarkAccess()->getFieldmarkAt(aPosition);
814 OSL_ENSURE(pBM && pBM->GetFieldname( ) == ODF_FORMCHECKBOX,
"Where is my form field bookmark???");
815 if (pBM && pBM->GetFieldname( ) == ODF_FORMCHECKBOX)
816 {
817 Width( rInf.GetTextHeight( ) );
818 Height( rInf.GetTextHeight( ) );
819 SetAscent( rInf.GetAscent( ) );
820 }
821 return false;
822 }
So putting "Height" first would change nothing.
817 Height( rInf.GetTextHeight( ) );
818 Width( rInf.GetTextHeight( ) );
Julien
On 18/11/2019 09:18, Miklos Vajna wrote:
Hi Julien,
I would just swap the width/height and wait for the first use-case that
indeed wants a vertical (rotated) checkbox.
Regards,
Miklos
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.