Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2019 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Stephan,

Stephan Bergmann wrote:
If not, the question is whether to backport the above fix to
libreoffice-6-1 (towards LO 6.1.6), libreoffice-6-2 (towards LO
6.2.4), and maybe even libreoffice-6-2-3. The fix isn't exactly
small, so I would prefer to not backport it aggressively.  But I
don't know how severely users would be affected by this issue.

I'd prefer a backport to both maintained branches - at the current
speed of new binary Java distros springing up (and the overall
trajectory of that ecosystem there), I'd expect more of those issues
down the road.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.