Re: On backporting fix for tdf#124503 "LibreOffice doesn't detect JVM because of unexpected java.vendor property value"

Am 12. April 2019 09:43:01 MESZ schrieb Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>:
> On 11/04/2019 10:35, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > On 11/04/2019 09:30, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > > I'd prefer a backport to both maintained branches - at the current
> > > speed of new binary Java distros springing up (and the overall
> > > trajectory of that ecosystem there), I'd expect more of those issues
> > > down the road.
> >
> > Fair enough.  Gerrit changes up for review at 
> > <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/70587/> for libreoffice-6-1 and
> at 
> > <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/70586/> for libreoffice-6-2.
>
> (BTW, I only tested my fix against stock OpenJDK reporting the Oracle 
> vendor string, by manually removing that vendor information from my 
> local LO sources temporarily.  It would be great if somebody could 
> actually test it against one of those problematic OpenJDK variants that
>
> are unknown in the LO sources.)
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Hi,

Did that last night with the libreoffice-6-1 branch including the backport.

Seems to work. At least no test failure :)

Regards,

Rene
-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.