Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>
Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:11:29 +0200

On 30/09/2018 05:20, Luke Benes wrote:

Also when there seems to have been a coding style that all <> includes outside of /inc folders 
should be defined by their relative path. Cppcheck only complains about 4 missing includes that do not 
follow this pattern.(see my earlier email on oddball includes).


See the root README.md for "Rules for #include directives (C/C++)".

Context

Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach · Luke Benes
- Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach · Tamás Zolnai
  - Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach · Maarten Hoes
  - Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach · slacka
    - Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach · Stephan Bergmann
    - Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach · Tamás Zolnai
- Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach · Maarten Hoes
- Re: Cppcheck: Reduction of False Positives: Manual Approach · Stephan Bergmann

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.