On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 13:04 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Filippo,
On Wednesday, 2016-12-14 09:59:28 +0000, Filippo giacchè wrote:
-why there is no need to modify that function?
Because it is called only in one place and that place in turn is
called
very rarely. There's almost no gain over all if only MatCopy() alone
was
optimized, despite that it proabbly can't, unless the underlying
matrix
structures/algorithms are touched from which all matrix functions
could
benefit, which would involve getting acquainted with
mdds::multi_type_matrix that is about the hardest stuff you can get
into.
On that front, I might just add that I've made the following change to
mdds::multi_type_matrix::copy (which MatCopy() uses internally)
https://gitlab.com/mdds/mdds/commit/6bd53e22dc21b6b88511d7e03e349021c37
56c47
which *should* automatically improve the performance of MatCopy() quite
a bit, depending on the use case.
The version of mdds we use on the master branch (and possibly some of
the older stable branches) already has this change in.
Kohei
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.