Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:55:01PM -0500, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
wrote:
By the way, one situation where it is debatable whether all the triggered
builds are useful is if you push a series of changes to gerrit, and
Jenkins
does builds for each of the changes in the series. For me at least, in
such
a situation it would suffice if Jenkins just only did a build for the
topmost change.
Evey commit should build.. bibisect will build each and every one of
them eventually
But isn't that the bibisect build instance, which is unrelated to the
gerrit builds?
You did not understand what Norbert was trying to say... Every commit
should _be buildable_. The bibisect builder pick the commits to build at
random, not only the last commit in a series (because there is no such
thing as a commit series in git).
D.
Context
- Re: Killing obsolete Jenkins builds (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.