On 11/19/2015 02:03 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com
<mailto:sbergman@redhat.com>> wrote:
    By the way, one situation where it is debatable whether all the
    triggered builds are useful is if you push a series of changes to
    gerrit, and Jenkins does builds for each of the changes in the
    series. For me at least, in such a situation it would suffice if
    Jenkins just only did a build for the topmost change.
Yes, good point. This could be helped by the plugin Samuel mentioned.
But it'd only work when you know what you're doing and when you are a
core developer with commit rights (I'd expect patches submitted by the
community to pass builds/tests before getting reviewed in most cases).
I don't see how pushing a coherent sequence of changes to gerrit is any 
different for core and non-core developers.  It is just that instead of 
having a single, large commit you split it up into meaningful units 
(that can depend on previous units).
Context
- Re: Killing obsolete Jenkins builds (continued)
 
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.