On 11/19/2015 02:03 PM, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com
<mailto:sbergman@redhat.com>> wrote:
By the way, one situation where it is debatable whether all the
triggered builds are useful is if you push a series of changes to
gerrit, and Jenkins does builds for each of the changes in the
series. For me at least, in such a situation it would suffice if
Jenkins just only did a build for the topmost change.
Yes, good point. This could be helped by the plugin Samuel mentioned.
But it'd only work when you know what you're doing and when you are a
core developer with commit rights (I'd expect patches submitted by the
community to pass builds/tests before getting reviewed in most cases).
I don't see how pushing a coherent sequence of changes to gerrit is any
different for core and non-core developers. It is just that instead of
having a single, large commit you split it up into meaningful units
(that can depend on previous units).
Context
- Re: Killing obsolete Jenkins builds (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.