On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:49 AM, David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:51:01PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Do not get me wrong. I applaud the effort to get rid of boost if we
can.. that is a big and expensive dep.
Except that I doubt we'll ever be able to do that. boost is used not
only by libreoffice, but also by many bundled libs. And there is a lot
of it used that'll hardly ever have an equivalent in the std. library.
Then that make the notion of dropping maverick only to be able to go
from boost::bind to std::
even less appealing.
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.