On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Thorsten Behrens
<thb@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Do not get me wrong. I applaud the effort to get rid of boost if we
can.. that is a big and expensive dep.
There's some amount of irony here, in that for c++11 and beyond, it's
sometimes just stuff moved out of boost into std, that makes our boost
exposure seemingly shrink. ;)
Yes, but we already pay the price of std:: :-)
and in the end not having to unpack few dozen of MB of headers would
be a net win
on my box make on boost is 1m6 elapsed and > 500MB or I/O
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.