Re: test infrastructure ideas appreciated ... - format validity checks

Michael Meeks wrote:
>       What of this don't we cover with the crashtester validation ?
I guess, as I said, but:

> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 18:59 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > Same applies to OOXML, having one box running the Open XML SDK there &
> > its validator would be awesome
> (http://openxmldeveloper.org/blog/b/openxmldeveloper/archive/2010/03/08/8242.aspx)
I thought we're running officeotron for ooxml? The SDK above would be
sortof nice, with it presumably having many more of the MSO
idiosyncrasies codified?

> > - have an up-to-date rng file in our tree, that needs to have
> >   extensions added the moment we start writing that out
>
>       Is it that ? =)
And that, yep. ;)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature