Re: Sort and copy results

On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:34 +0200, Kevin André wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk> wrote:
> > That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's
> > too long ago to remember the details, and it was in a cell (can't
> > remember whether it was a Writer table or Calc). Anyways, I filled the
> > cell and tabbed away. The AutoCorrupt kicked in. And <ctrl-z> reversed
> > the ENTIRE operation, deleting the text I'd typed! I just *could* *not*
> > work out how to get LO to accept what I'd typed without insisting on
> > corrupting it.
> >
> > So it makes a lot of sense, in many circumstances, for a user's input to
> > be treated as multiple steps requiring multiple undos, even when it's
> > just one user action that triggers it.
>
> This.
> Please check out bug #36867 which I filed 3 years ago and still isn't fixed.

Just so you know, piggybacking on a thread and say "please fix my
favorite bug I filed x years ago" is not appreciated.

As always, patches are welcome.

Kohei