On 06/06/14 12:27, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Good. Now I have someone real I can ask.
Can I ask in what use case this feature is used? Why does your use case
require that copying and sorting have to be done in one step, rather
than in two separate steps?
Why can't LibreOffice treat it as two separate steps, INCLUDING for
things like undo? Treat the copy as one operation, then the sort as a
second operation, and if you need to undo it then it's two <ctrl-z>, not
one?
That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's
too long ago to remember the details, and it was in a cell (can't
remember whether it was a Writer table or Calc). Anyways, I filled the
cell and tabbed away. The AutoCorrupt kicked in. And <ctrl-z> reversed
the ENTIRE operation, deleting the text I'd typed! I just *could* *not*
work out how to get LO to accept what I'd typed without insisting on
corrupting it.
So it makes a lot of sense, in many circumstances, for a user's input to
be treated as multiple steps requiring multiple undos, even when it's
just one user action that triggers it.
Cheers,
Wol
Context
- Re: Sort and copy results (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.