Re: minutes of ESC call ...

On 9 mai 2014 16:01:09 CEST, Italo Vignoli <italo@italovignoli.com> wrote:
> On 08/05/14 17:29, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> > * Should we simplify version numbering? (Kendy)
> >     + So far major.minor.micro, but due to our release plan, all our
> versions
> >       are continuous improvements - does it make sense to still keep
> 'major'?
> >         [ ie. should we do 4.3.0 -> 5.0, 4.4.3 -> 6.3, etc.? ]
>
> Marketing wise, this should be carefully prepared, as otherwise it
> would
> become a real problem for users (and also for journalists). They have
> just become accustomed to this release numbering and to the fast pace
> of
> time based releases, and the risk is that they would not understand why
> we are changing.


Esp. When we are about to change the "stable" to "mature".

Best, 

Charles. 

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.