Re: Mac OS X 64-bit, libstdc++ vs. libc++

On 01/20/2014 05:24 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Current libreoffice-4-2 does build fine for me against Xcode 5.0.2 (on OS X
> > 10.9.1), with --enable-64-bit --enable-libc++ (among various other
> > configuration switches).  (The underlying Clang of that Xcode version is
> > reported as "Apple LLVM version 5.0 (clang-500.2.79) (based on LLVM
> > 3.3.svn)".)
>
> Well that is surprizing because here --enable-libc++ make autogen
> choke due to 'unrecognized option'And I did the test above with
> --enable-64-bit and --enable-libcpp (I modified the name of the
> argument to get pass autogen.sh issue with it)

...but that option is apparently spelled --enable-libc++ ever since its 
inception in f5aa04485c86a5753bd7af057b86336efe089fae (which is 
contained in all of the master, libreoffice-4-2", and libreoffice-4-2-0 
branches).

Stephan