On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
two libraries to work with both flavors of LO. (And, given the assumption
that Apple will eventually discontinue the support of libstdc++, recommend
that native extensions---which there are none yet for Mac OS X 64-bit---use
libc++.)
Other thoughts?
I defer to your expertise on that...
I know it is very very late in the release cycle for 4.2.. otoh if
the premise of your technical argument are true, the switch should be
'transparent' no?
iow, if we are going to take a risk, why not take it right now rather
than actually _have_ released version for 64 bits with 2 different std
lib.
worse case scenario we just do not release the 64 bits version for
4.2... and wait for 4.2.1.
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.