On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Joren DC <jorendc@libreoffice.org> wrote:
What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)?
lbz was also one of the choises, but it looks like a golden midway
between the top votes :)?
I don't really want to get involved in this bikesheding, but if there
was a vote at a QA meeting, it sounds unfair to me take the result of
that into this list and start arguing against its result.
Given that the top two choices (lo and lobz) were separated by only 1
vote and were both far ahead of the other options, suggesting a
compromise seems like a reasonable action.
Why would
anyone cast his/her vote seriously next time, if the result of the vote
is not respected?
I believe the vote is being respected, but I don't want to get into
that here. As many have said, we're just bikeshedding here. I
apologize for drawing out this discussion on the dev list for so long
-- I'll take this discussion back to the QA list.
Cheers,
--R
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.