Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Robinson Tryon
<bishop.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > * lo
> > 1st rank. YES!
> > ...
> > > > * lobz
> > No, too long. Lobster, anyone?
> >
> > From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the
> > alreay short enough commit summary line.
>
> Hi all -- thank you for voting! For those of you who haven't yet
> voted...do it! We'll close the voting process at the next QA call.
>
> Here's a quick summary of how the votes have been cast so far:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal#We.27re_now_voting.21.21.21
>
> The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit
> messages),

Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ?

> but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the
> list has taken an early lead.
Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than
here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo#

Norbert

PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to
re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is
sufficient enough to make that clear
so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely
redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down...