Re: Question on dubious code

On 10/07/2013 03:35 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 19:45 +0200, Matteo Casalin wrote:
> > looks wrong to me since aUserData cannot start with both aProt and
> > ".". I had a look at older revisions, but the logic remains the same at
> > least from when it was integrated in 2005 with commit
> > 4fdb2d2cb198e7ea85d1293333d96a6c26b50323
>
> So, the commit where the problem appears seems to be
> 710a553683cef16be38fa8ef35b1dc88fb607ba4 and references #i35133#, but I
> think that's a further typo and the real bug was #i35113# which has as
> its 2nd last comment "document will be attached later" and they never
> were :-)
>
> > Does anybody knows ho to deal with this (the comparison with "./" should
> > be done after aProt, is completely unnecessary, or something else)?
>
> Well, the intent was presumably to see if the token
> *following* ...Package: started with "./" but seeing as its been 9 years
> since that code was introduced I recommend you just delete the
> impossible-to-reach if block.
>
> C.

Sorry for the long delay, fixed now with 
fc357b79e71577916e8d1970c6419619b950bd1c

Many thanks for the review!

Cheers
Matteo