Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 09/11/2013 07:28 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:54:58PM +0200, bjoern wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:04:01PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 09/09/13 10:38, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:

Actually, it could make sense to document the API available in each
version, that is, have something like:

http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/3.3/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/3.6/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.0/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.1/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.2/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/current/idl/

Well, properly packaged versions come with their own api-docs, so
IMHO no need to keep docs for unsupported releases around.

Packaged docs are much less practical for the user.

I always love it how <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/> (linked as "Documentation: Manual" from the GCC homepage <http://gcc.gnu.org/>) unambiguously makes available the documentation for each released GCC major.minor version. Could serve as a model for us.

Stephan

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.