On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:54:58PM +0200, bjoern wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:04:01PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 09/09/13 10:38, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Actually, it could make sense to document the API available in each
version, that is, have something like:
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/3.3/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/3.6/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.0/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.1/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/4.2/idl/
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/current/idl/
Well, properly packaged versions come with their own api-docs, so
IMHO no need to keep docs for unsupported releases around.
Packaged docs are much less practical for the user.
1) Need to install the old "packaged version" (or at least its SDK) to
check e.g. backwards compatibility. Much easier to quickly check
online.
2) Online docs are automatically indexed (DuckDuckGo, Google, Bing,
...), searchable, a general Internet search finds them, ...
--
Lionel
Context
doxygen API doc: list of uses? · Lionel Elie Mamane
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.