On 09/04/2013 11:56 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu> wrote:On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:00:28PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:On 08/03/2013 02:56 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:* API date issue (Lionel/Stephan) + patches pending on gerrit for -4-1 AI: + review & get them in before Monday: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5245So, consensus appears to be to go with option 1 ("Break ABI/API in 4.1.1") from <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-July/054764.html> "More time-related API headache"? Did you happen to have any further discussion about it during the ESC meeting?So, we did that for LibreOffice 4.1, but api.libreoffice.org still documents the old API. Who can regenerated api.libreoffice.org from up-to-date libreoffice-4-1 (or master?) branch?I updated api.libreoffice.org from master.
Thanks Andras,<http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/module-ix.html> (linked as "IDL Reference" from <http://api.libreoffice.org/>) gives 404.
And <http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/cpp/ref/index.html> (linked as "C++ Reference" from <http://api.libreoffice.org/>) still claims "LibreOffice 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ SDK C/C++ API Reference," so I'm not sure whether the website files didn't get updated, or got updated from a stale master build.
Also, it occurs to me that we should give the SDK version number also on the main <http://api.libreoffice.org/> page, to avoid confusion. I'll look into the odk/ sources from which it is generated.
Finally, can you give a quick instructions how to update that site (what permissions does one need to request where, etc.)? Would probably make sense to have more people able to do that (and sure, I'd volunteer to be one of them).
Stephan