Re: build difficulty

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>
Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:11:56 +0200

On 08/30/2013 09:16 AM, Fridrich Strba wrote:

Sometimes my question is why on the earth one does not make something
non-copyable by declaring and not defining private copy constructor and
operator= and bothers with the complexity of boost for just this little
thing.

...because boost::noncopyable has become the de-facto standard idiom forthis, at least for pre-C++11 code that depends on Boost anyway.[citation missing]


Stephan

Context

build difficulty · dk122
- Re: build difficulty · Kohei Yoshida
  - Re: build difficulty · Stephan van den Akker
    - Re: build difficulty · Kohei Yoshida
      - Re: build difficulty · Kohei Yoshida
        
        Re: build difficulty · Stephan van den Akker
      - Re: build difficulty · Fridrich Strba
        
        Re: build difficulty · bjoern
        
        Re: build difficulty · Stephan Bergmann
        
        Re: build difficulty · Fridrich Strba
        
        Re: build difficulty · bjoern
        Re: build difficulty · Fridrich Strba
        
        Re: build difficulty · Stephan Bergmann
        
        Re: build difficulty · Thorsten Behrens
  - Re: build difficulty · Terrence Enger

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.