Sometimes my question is why on the earth one does not make something
non-copyable by declaring and not defining private copy constructor and
operator= and bothers with the complexity of boost for just this little
thing.
Get me right, I love boost, since it simplifies many things, but then
noncopyable is not one of those things that were difficult without it.
Cheers
Fridrich
On 29/08/13 21:30, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On 08/29/2013 03:27 PM, Stephan van den Akker wrote:
Kohei: Can you explain what your change does? I might try that too.
No idea exactly, other than that it avoids the lines that cause error in
my build. I got the idea by reading the offending boost header file
boost/boost/noncopyable.hpp.
Kohei
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.