Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Am 27.06.2013 21:44, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I have added Bjoern to this as he's the one who might be impacted most
because of the Ubuntu issue.

Can we maybe make the wording more explicit e.g. "reached EOL at TDF"(*)? 

1) I'd even prefer a positive wording ("3.5 Ubuntu" or similar) - if
something short + appropriate can be found.

2) just another thought: does it matter *why* we list the 3.5? Why not
leaving it just "3.5 all versions" like the other 3.x Versions?

@ Robinson (quoting 27.06.2013, 22:04):

Where do we want these bugs to end up?

another consideration might be:
Do we want offer a platform to a Joe Average bug reporter to report
bugs against these versions? (Why?)

My suggestion from a QA perspective: We should. At least we should try.
If we get overwhelmed with NOTOURBUGs or FIXED in all other versions, we
should reconsider.

Nino

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.