On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen <
bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:57:44AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I have added Bjoern to this as he's the one who might be impacted most
because of the Ubuntu issue.
Can we maybe make the wording more explicit e.g. "reached EOL at TDF"(*)?
That
makes it easier to dispell urban myths that its not supported elsewhere.
Same
for RHEL which AFAIK has the endless joy of supporting 3.4 on one of their
releases.
Where would this wording go? I think that's good to let people know but
trying to figure out where to put it as the list versions are all pretty
short. A tooltip might be useful, any thoughts here Robinson? We were
talking about this quite a bit earlier.
Best,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero.dev@gmail.com
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.