Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 19:18 -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
I fully agree with this sentiment -- the dev-list should be taylored to be
inviting to a wide audience of volunteer contributors and not only to those
hardcore contributors who are full-time sponsored developers.
...
So, is there anyone who is _not_ a sponsored developer opposing to kill the mail
spammage? If so:

Speaking as a non-core dev, I would very much appreciate this change.

        Guys (not just you Robinson of course, Bjoern and others) - please lets
not have this nonsense division between sponsored or not. I know of
people who are not paid that contribute an incredible amount of work,
and I know of people who are full-time but somehow don't do any
significant amount of patch review via. gerrit or elsewhere at all.

        Lets have the discussion without this false and unhelpfully divisive
distinction. I strongly suggest that if we need to weigh anything in
this balance then the amount of time they spend, and the amount of
reviewing work they do is what counts - not how they feed themselves :-)

        ATB,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.