Re: conversion operators for UNO

On 04/30/2013 05:55 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > On 04/25/2013 10:35 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
> > > I want to change things so that I can write:
> > >    void bar() {
> > >        Reference<B> b = ....
> > >        methodThatTakesA( b );
> > >    }
> Yeah. One of my older pet peeves...
>
> Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > This has been discussed before more than once, but I tend to forget
> > whether it has never gone past discussion stage because the
> > implementation would be slightly tricky (using SFNIAE to restrict
> > implicit conversions from Reference<B> to Reference<A> to cases
> > where B is derived from A) or because there was some fundamental
> > flaw with it.
> Works by and large with the proof of concept from
>
>   https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/3698/
>
> , the only problem I recall, is a slight performance degradation,
> since IIRC then operator Reference<XInterface>& needs to go due to
> ambiguities (which avoids temporaries). Possibly offset nicely by
> needing much less queryInterfaces...

So I came up in parallel with <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/3699/> 
that does not require to include Boost headers in URE headers (though at 
the expense of borrowing some concepts from boost::is_base_and_derived, 
ultimately to be cleaned up with C++11 std::is_base_of), coexists 
happily with the Reference<XInterface> conversion operator, doesn't 
require changes all over the place (compared to Noel's 
<https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/3613/> I started it off from), 
doesn't use queryInterface internally (but thus doesn't support 
ambiguous up-casts in MI scenarios).

I'm giving it a try currently on the gerrit bulidbots (and will be back 
next Monday to discuss further).

Stephan