Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index 

On 2013-04-04 10:53, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Well, IMHO the main problem with the unoapi tests wrt this is that they 'centralized' a lot of the expectations on the UNO-Api -- which made them hard to quickly rewrite in C++.
If this leads to more reliable tests of any kind, which will turn into tests of the C++ kind when they first fail, Im all for it.
These two statements are mutually contradictory. Either Java/Python unit tests are easy to convert to C++, or they are not, you can't have it both ways :-)
Besides, LO is a C++ program - if you can already code in C++, why would you want to switch to a different language to write a unit test? 

Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.