Re: yet another unit test framework? -- was fdo#55814: unit test is missing

David Ostrovsky wrote:
> with https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/3128/ we have support for unit
> tests written in python. (We have even found two bugs with it
> already ... and fixed).
I like it, because it probably increases the number of people able to
write unit tests. I dislike it, since as you admit yourself it makes
debugging a failing test a possibly frustrating experience.

Then again, turning a working python test into a working C++ one is
probably a rather mechanical EasyHack. Therefore, a net benefit in my
mind.

Out of curiosity, was that sparked by the Python test discussion at
the Impress Sprint?

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature