Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On 02/22/2013 04:51 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 21:50 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
The issue is purely academic, but if it _has_ to be resolved then yes
a compatibility mode has a much better value that creating an
'alternate' function.
        True - though clearly there is some residual benefit in importing ODF
files with this sort of function in them - luckily there is a ~zero
deployed-base of that so far.

        As a general yard-stick, we take function compatibility with Excel
extremely seriously - it is clearly imperative to our users to have
confidence that their spreadsheets continue to work as they move to the
world of ODF implementations.

        Having said that - when it comes to corner-cases we have much bigger
problems in this area than this issue. One example would be the absence
of a true 'boolean' type in our core; such that when you run the
gnumeric test sheet here:

http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnumeric/plain/samples/excel/operator.xls

        you can ponder at length whether: '=TRUE() > "Liz"' should be true or
false for example ;-)

        So - IMHO there is little value at all in further discussion on this
topic, and backwards-compatibility with ODF + numeric sanity trumps the
corner-case at least until we have a much more consistent set of
corner-case solutions.

        But of course, I would defer to the calc team; and as Tor and Norbert
says - -strongly- discourage an endless bike-shed on this from those
outside the set of people who have already contributed code to calc.

        All the best :-)

                Michael.

My opinion is that it is probably useful to document any known issues, especially issues that may be considered for implementation. If we are able to identify issues, especially issues with "easy" solutions, then those can be added to the list of easy things to do in LO for new contributors.

Norbert, along this same line, you stated:

I think there are many more interop problems with much more visible
and real-life effect that would be a better use of one's time.

Do you consider any of these "visible" issues as something that can be posed as "easy things for a 
developer new to LO to attempt"?


--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info:  http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.