Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 16/11/12 20:30, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
     The real question is - what is the deliverable here ? building on
windows under cygwin is -horribly- slow - if we can use the same
compiler to cross-compile from Linux (as we can) and build around 50x
faster - why would we want to do work & maintenance to keep that
going ? :-)

Oh! Do you know where that slowdown is coming from ?

evidently local file system (NTFS) is rather slow, and process creation
is very slow (which is important for any make-based build system).

but the slowness of building locally on Windows is nothing compared to
the glacial pace at which a Windows build proceeds over network file
systems like SMB; fortunately nobody has been doing that for years...

Hopefully (when fully finished) the move to gnumake will at least strip
out one layer of (dmake) grief that makes such things more painful than
they really need to be.

Does this also mean kicking out autotools ?

LO doesn't use autotools, only autoconf.  but of course many bundled
external libraries use full autotools.



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.