Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Is there some specific reason for using MSVC instead of gcc ?

 Currently ABI backwards-compatibility for compiled extensions.

There are also some features in the code that don't compile with
MinGW. They use API that MinGW does not provide headers for etc.

Let me also point out that we definitely do not want to build
*locally* on Windows with GCC (MinGW). MinGW makes sense to us only
for cross-compilation. If one wants to build locally on a Windows
machine, use MSVC.

Note that when we say MinGW, we actually mean mingw-w64, a fork of
MinGW that provides a more complete set of headers and import
libraries for various Windows APIs. (Despite the "w64" in the name,
they do provide a tool-chain producing 32-bit code, too.)

--tml

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.