Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 16/11/12 12:12, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Is there some specific reason for using MSVC instead of gcc ?

 Currently ABI backwards-compatibility for compiled extensions.

There are also some features in the code that don't compile with
MinGW. They use API that MinGW does not provide headers for etc.

in addition to above points also there are also open questions around
how we would run unit tests in a MinGW cross-compilation environment and
how well gdb works on Windows; the MSVC C++ debugger is really quite good.



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.