Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Dennis,

On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 12:39 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It is obviously a fork. 

        Ho hum; you're aware of the interaction history we have had with those
working on the original cppunit ? I'd be interested in how they would
characterise it.

making a clean fork ... better than claim-jumping

        You make some quite strident assertions there of dirtiness and more. On
what do you base your confidence ?

        Personally I'm thrilled that Markus has picked up the torch here - unit
testing is really important to LibreOffice, and Markus is my personal
hero there :-)

        All the best,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.