Hi Dennis,
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 12:39 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It is obviously a fork.
Ho hum; you're aware of the interaction history we have had with those
working on the original cppunit ? I'd be interested in how they would
characterise it.
making a clean fork ... better than claim-jumping
You make some quite strident assertions there of dirtiness and more. On
what do you base your confidence ?
Personally I'm thrilled that Markus has picked up the torch here - unit
testing is really important to LibreOffice, and Markus is my personal
hero there :-)
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.