Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 01:32 +0200, Mat M wrote:
About AV, --without-cve-unit is enough, but having a way to bypass unit  
testing could be practical for some specific cases.

        I tend to agree that a --without-cve-unit option make some sense, and
is vastly preferable (as Markus points out) to making it easy to disable
the cppunit tests generally :-)

        A -really-smart-[1] anti-virus checker will notice that we have
de-crypted the CVE documents in memory and will kill our unit tests in
response; so the encryption on disk would only help us get them
downloaded I suspect.

        Thanks :-)

                Michael.

[1] - you know the ones that bring your machine nearly to it's knees.
-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.