On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:51 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-06-29 14:47, Caolán McNamara wrote:
I looked through some of these, some patches are just experimental
stuff or debugging patches or obsolete stuff.
Maybe we should have some way of marking bugs in "in-progress" or
"experimental" ?
Maybe just push bugs that have incomplete patches into NEEDSINFO state?
We could use whiteboard for that I guess; it's a shame to be looking at
the same experimental patches again when I spent that time a few months
back already. I tried to subset to only 25 from the 60 by doing some
'something changed since' that date in my monster query.
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.