Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
that makes sense in general, but (to my non-legally-trained eyes) it
looks like this patch is so simple that it very likely doesn't meet the
threshold of creativity that is required to be eligible for copyright
protection in the first place

        I don't want to go there really. Please just re-implement the fix in a
different way - and/or if this is a really key-fix we can re-base that
one file in 3.6.

        I'm glad author E-mails are going into svn these days - we can use them
in future post the re-base to ensure crediting / affiliations etc. are
correctly given.

        ATB,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.